CaliforniaSchoolsTierra Bonita Elementary

Tierra Bonita Elementary

PublicRegular
Lancaster, California · Eastside Union Elementary
Teachers26.0FTE
Ratio25.7:1students per teacher
Students668enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students668
Grade Span0–6
Student:Teacher25.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch90%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
22.7:1
11.7%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
28
7.7%vs prior yr
Enrollment
636
4.8%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:601
7.3%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:18
99.1%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:9
99.0%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:36
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.4:117.3:120.1:122.9:125.7:128.6:12020202120222023202424.0:127.6:125.3:125.7:122.7:1Tierra Bonita ElementaryUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

594615636656677698252526272828202020212022202320246016916846686362525272628EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment601691684668636
Teacher FTE2525272628
Pupil : Teacher ratio24.0:127.6:125.3:125.7:122.7:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:7001:1,4001:2,1001:2,7991:3,4992015201720201:3,2401:6481:6011:36Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:7001:1,4001:2,1001:2,7991:3,4992015201720201:3,2401:1,9641:181:9821:9261:9Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)0.211
Nurses (FTE)0.20.333
Psychologists (FTE)0.70.766
Social Workers (FTE)0016.5
Counselor : Pupils1:3,2401:6481:6011:250
Nurse : Pupils1:3,2401:1,9641:181:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:9821:9261:91:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:361:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.