CaliforniaSchoolsLuther Burbank Middle

Luther Burbank Middle

PublicAlternative/other
Los Angeles, California · Los Angeles Unified
Teachers52.0FTE
Ratio16.7:1students per teacher
Students866enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students866
Grade Span6–8
Student:Teacher16.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch86%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
17.2:1
3.0%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
48
7.7%vs prior yr
Enrollment
824
4.8%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:344
6.9%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:1,032
6.9%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
NASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:1,032
6.9%vs prior yrSSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

15.0:116.1:117.2:118.4:119.5:120.6:12020202120222023202420.2:118.7:116.7:116.7:117.2:1Luther Burbank MiddleUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

8078569049521,0001,049484950525354202020212022202320241,0329929048668245153545248EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment1,032992904866824
Teacher FTE5153545248
Pupil : Teacher ratio20.2:118.7:116.7:116.7:117.2:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:2401:4791:7191:9581:1,1982015201720201:3701:3701:3441:1,1091:1,032Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:2401:4791:7191:9581:1,1982015201720201:5551:1,1091:1,0321:555Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)333
Nurses (FTE)211
Psychologists (FTE)2
Social Workers (FTE)011
Counselor : Pupils1:3701:3701:3441:250
Nurse : Pupils1:5551:1,1091:1,0321:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:5551:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:1,1091:1,0321:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.