CaliforniaSchoolsFred T. Korematsu Elementary at Mace Ranch

Fred T. Korematsu Elementary at Mace Ranch

PublicRegular
Davis, California · Davis Joint Unified
Teachers22.0FTE
Ratio23.7:1students per teacher
Students522enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students522
Grade Span0–6
Student:Teacher23.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch32%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
24.2:1
2.1%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
21
4.5%vs prior yr
Enrollment
509
2.5%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:465
80.8%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:1,163
64.0%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:664
24.7%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:2,325
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.6:116.9:119.1:121.4:123.6:125.9:12020202120222023202424.5:125.1:124.5:123.7:124.2:1This schoolUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

459476494511529546191920212222202020212022202320244654775405225091919222221EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment465477540522509
Teacher FTE1919222221
Pupil : Teacher ratio24.5:125.1:124.5:123.7:124.2:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:5241:1,0481:1,5711:2,0951:2,6192015201720201:9701:2,4251:4651:2,325Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:6981:1,3971:2,0951:2,7941:3,4922015201720201:1,3861:3,2331:1,1631:9701:8821:664Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)0.50.21
Nurses (FTE)0.40.20.4
Psychologists (FTE)0.50.60.7
Social Workers (FTE)000.2
Counselor : Pupils1:9701:2,4251:4651:250
Nurse : Pupils1:1,3861:3,2331:1,1631:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:9701:8821:6641:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:2,3251:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.